Skip to main content

About your Search

20130115
20130123
SHOW
STATION
MSNBCW 2
MSNBC 1
LANGUAGE
Search Results 0 to 2 of about 3 (some duplicates have been removed)
MSNBC
Jan 16, 2013 11:00am PST
about the debate as they see it. they are focusing in on the president's daughters, sasha and melee in the ad saying they have security at their school so why shouldn't the children of other americans? let me get your reaction to that. the white house obviously coming out against it. what is your thought there? >> i just saw a bit of that ad and i think it's terribly mistaken. the president's children are in a different category in one sense, but the real issue is whether all the children of this country will be safeguarded. i think that means some resources in the schools, but it means way beyond it. there is violence beyond the schools on street corners everywhere. what we are doing is saying what if it were a family member? that permanentization is very, very legitimate and makes newtown a seminole event. i think the ground is changing. >> the nra if the ground is changing, it may be dividing democrats and the nra and gun rights folks and gun control advocates even more. the nra said attacking firearms and ignoring children is not a solution to the crisis we face as a nation. onl
MSNBC
Jan 17, 2013 11:00am PST
david keene on this morning, still defending the ad saying it is not about malea and sasha obama and "the washington post" gave them four pinnochios for the ad and one thing they point to is the ad says that the president skeptical about armed security guards in school when in the interview the president had with david gregory he said he was skeptical it's the only answer is putting more guns in school. that was the exact quote that they have pointed out. they then go on to talk about the security at sidwell school and say that the numbers or this image that's purported in this web ad is also not correct. that there's no such armed guards there. to take the president's words out of context, michael, to misrepresenting this armed force that they were implying is at the school of these children and then pretending that they weren't talking about the president's children when it was clear of that case, does that only appeal to the fringe or do you have some moderate republicans, michael, out there and they see it was a misrepresentation and that it crossed some kind of line? >> frin
Search Results 0 to 2 of about 3 (some duplicates have been removed)